DBSRVEdit 2.4.1 Access Violations after Update

ScaleRichView support and discussion (TRichView add-on for WYSIWYG editing)
Post Reply
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

DBSRVEdit 2.4.1 Access Violations after Update

Post by mwilems1 »

I'm trying to install the new version of ScaleRichViewEdit v2.4.1.

I could not find the full version downloads for RichView nor RVActions so I let the installer download the files.

After following the instructions to update RV 11.1.1 and RVA 1.72, The installer for SRV got to the license Agree/Don't Agree page. When I Agreed to the license, I got three Access Violation messages. The following registration page shows the Activation code and destination path properly. The Registration name is "- - -". It also show a line saying "*registration key is found".

Please HELP. I need to have a prototype including the SRVLabel, SRVButton, SRVEdit, and SRVCheckBox; which I also need to locate these bpl's and source.
Last edited by mwilems1 on Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by mwilems1 »

I uninstalled SRV and DBSRV, removed the registry entries and the first time through, the installed just crashed and after that there were the access violations again.
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by mwilems1 »

The error seems to be in the registry reader/writer. After clearing the TSRichViewEdit entry from the registry, the installer crashes while updating or reading the registry. It added the key but did not add any values under it and did not allow me to enter my registration information before it crashed.
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by mwilems1 »

Stepped back to SRV 2.2.1. I still got access violations on the installer, but it did not crash and completed the install. So, after three hours, I'm back to where I started except I have the latest versions of RV and RVA.

I'm still looking for the SRVEdit, SRVLabel, SRVCheckBox, ...
Sergey Tkachenko
Site Admin
Posts: 17559
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:28 am
Contact:

Post by Sergey Tkachenko »

SRVControls are here: http://www.trichview.com/rvfiles/scaler ... ntrols.zip
But they require SRV 2.4.1.
I asked Ilya to resend a source code of SRV 2.4.1 to you without an installer.
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by mwilems1 »

Thanks Sergey.

Not sure why I'm having problems with the installer. I'm running Vista Home Premium and I keep my machine very clean. Only stuff installed is Office 2007, RAD Studio 2009, MySQL 5.5, and Adobe CS3. Nothing that I would expect to interfere with an installer.

SRV 2.2 gives the same Installer error, but seems to update the registry and move on. SRV 2.4 crashes and only sets the key HCU\Software\TSRichViewEdit with no values in it.

It just occurred to me. Doesn't it try to get the "Registered To" name? I ran into the same thing when a key is set but you look for a value that doesn't exist. It might be in that. But still, why am I the only one having this problem? Strange. If I can help, let me know.

I don't have any problems with the RichView installer.

Thanks again.
proxy3d
ScaleRichView Developer
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:37 am

Post by proxy3d »

Sorry, while the place of your problem is not found in the installer. On all computers tested by me the installer works normally (with other access rights). Now I try to test ThtmlViewer (http://www.pbear.com/) as for me with it were before a problem. I use its old version. I will try to refresh it.

I have sent you source codes without the installer.
mwilems1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by mwilems1 »

My user is the only user on the computer and I have administrator rights. I have also turned off all limits I could without digging in to the registry. I want to keep my development computers as "normal" as possible so my deployment will function on most other computers.

Thanks so much for addressing this for me.
Post Reply