Def btw version 14 and 16 in numeric

[mohsen24000]

Hi
in version 14, in arabic context, numbers and notes numbers shown as arabic, but in version 16 same file, notes number are latin and numbers in context, only unicodes shown arabic and others are latin.
how resolve this deference!?

[Sergey Tkachenko]

Please send me a sample document to email richviewgmailcom, or attach to this topic.

[mohsen24000]

Please send me a sample document to email richviewgmailcom, or attach to this topic.

Thanks a lot.
Sample sent.

[Sergey Tkachenko]

I am sorry, I cannot reproduce the difference.
I searched my hard drive for old versions of ActionTest, found ActionTest compiled with TRichView 13.13.2 and TRichView 14.15.1. The both of them show Western numbers in footnotes. I checked the first footnote in A.rvf.
Actually, this is the expected behavior. The notes are displayed according to TRVStyle.FootnoteNumbering (see https://www.trichview.com/help/idh_trvs ... ering.html ) which does not include Eastern Arabic numbers. I checked MS Word, it includes more options for numbering (including Chinese, Japanese, Korean numbers), but it does not include Eastern Arabic numbers as well.

[mohsen24000]

Thanks
I change (set) TextEngine of RVStyle to rvteWindows, numbers in context show as arabic, but notes numbers is latin yet still.

[mohsen24000]

Hi
Please guide me, how prevent changing style of Note number when use ApplyTextStyle for selected text that contain Note number!?

[Sergey Tkachenko]

Include rvprStyleProtect in Protection property of a text style associated with the note number.